MANUSCRIPTS CONTAINING BOTH TESTAMENTS
The Syriac Version was a translation for those early Christians in the mountain districts of Syria. It is one of the earliest New Testament versions, translated about 150 A.D., almost contemporary with the writings of the apostles. It contained both the Old and New Testament. It was translated from the Greek Septuagint. Copies of the Syriac version are in existence today, preserved at Leningrad in Russia, and at a monastery in Sinai. This version, like the Septuagint itself, is of great to translators and students of the Bible.
Latin Versions were necessary for the regions of North Africa, particularly around the area of Carthage where Latin became the predominant language. This manuscript was called the African Latin, written about 300 A.D. Many other Latin versions were coming into existence as Latin gradually superseded Greek. These versions included both the Old and New Testaments, translated from the Greek. But there was a problem; with all the versions appearing, there were so many deviations, variations and outright mistakes occurring in these copies that a complete revision became necessary. The work of this revision fell upon the shoulders of a very capable and learned scholar of the third century A.D. named Jerome.
The sources he used for the translation of the Old Testament were the Hebrew manuscripts, the Septuagint, and the Syriac Old Testament manuscripts. The New Testament was mainly a revision of earlier Latin manuscripts, with the help of the Greek and Syriac manuscript. His work was completed in 386 A.D., and is termed the LATIN VULGATE. Wikipedia states: "It takes its name from the phrase versio vulgata, "the common (i.e., popular) version." Some 30,000 copies of it were made and circulated. For hundreds of years it was regarded, and still is by the Roman Church, as the only correct text, and has had tremendous influence upon our modern versions.
This is so called because of its fairly recent Discovery at the monastery at Sinai. The Sinaitic Manuscript was written about 300 A.D. and contained both the whole Bible in Greek. It was lost to the world at a very early date, but was discovered at Sinai in 1853. It was first removed to Leningrad, but was purchased by the British museum in 1933. It is extremely important because of it's great age, and the fact it contains a complete copy of the Book of Apocalypse, the Revelation of Jesus Christ. (see: 1866, Constantin von Tischendorf, When Were Our Gospels Written? An Argument by Constantine Tischendorf. With a Narrative of the Discovery of the Sinaitic Manuscript. New York: American Tract Society, 1866).
The Vatican Manuscript was originally copied from the Septuagint Version and New Testament Greek manuscripts about 370 A.D.. It contained the entire Greek Bible, though parts of it are now missing due to age. This manuscript is now in the Vatican Library, although when or how it came to the Vatican is not known. It was not made available to translators until 1867.
"The Alexandrian Manuscript" is a Greek Translation of the whole Bible which was written about 400 A.D. It is now lacking in certain parts. It was handed over to Britain in 1624 and is now located in the British Museum. It is an important witness to the manuscripts both of the Septuagint and the New Testament Greek.
All during the time that these copies were being written, great and sweeping changes were taking place in the literary and religious world. Latin was becoming the predominant language. As time went on, Greek and Hebrew were all but forgotten except by serious scholars of the day. This is the reason that important manuscripts such as we have just looked at were consigned to obscurity almost as soon as they were written. The LATIN VULGATE was promoted by the Roman Church as being the only true version of the Bible. They forgot that it was simply a translation of Hebrew and Greek manuscripts. Of the Vulgate they said, "It is the version of the Church, in her own language, Latin; why should it yield to Greek and Hebrew manuscripts, which have been for all these hundreds of years in the hands of Jewish unbelievers and Greek schismatics?"
This attitude set the stage for a display of violent resistance and persecution in those times against anyone who should undertake the work of translating scripture into the common language of the people. The Roman Church came to consider itself custodian of the Bible and made every effort to keep it out of the hands of the public. They were successful in locking up the Vulgate manuscripts; however, due to it's large initial circulation - 30,000, "the Latin Vulgate" continued to be a widely read Bible, but decreasingly so as once more the passing of centuries witnessed a gradual shift in the predominance of the language. By natural means the "church" was getting its way, for as less and less people in the passing of generations understood Latin, the Bible became less and less available to the public.
A few of these appeared on the scene about the ninth century A.D. They did not flourish because only a few copies were made, and the Anglo-Saxon language was very unstable at that time, being in a stage of rapid change.
These versions were direct translations from the Latin Vulgate into the Anglo-Saxon tongue. Succeeding copies endeavored to keep pace with the changing of the language, hence there were scores of revisions and alterations produced during this period of history.
THE WYCLIFFE BIBLE
About 1350 A.D. an Englishman named John Wycliffe translated the Latin Vulgate into the English language. The British people then finally had a Bible they could read and understand in their own language. That accomplishment aroused the fury and wrath of the Roman Church. Their attitude towards Wycliffe was expressed by an arch-bishop (Archbishop Arundel) as "That pestilent wretch, the son of the old serpent, the forerunner of anti-christ, who had completed his iniquity by inventing a new translation of the Scriptures." Before they were able to pour out their vicious vengeance upon him, however, Wycliffe died a quiet and peaceful natural death.
The fires of the wrath of the frustrated priesthood had been fanned. Many of Wycliffe's followers were killed. Bible Readers were burned alive with copies of the Bible tied around their necks. Parents were executed for teaching their children the Lord's prayer and the Ten Commandments in English. Husbands and wives were made to witness against each other. Children were forced to light the fires that would burn their parents to death while they watched. Possessors of the Wycliffe Bible were hunted down and killed.
At the same time all this was going on, several things were developing destined to turn the tide and render the Church's warfare against the translation of the Bible into common languages a losing one. Wycliffe's translation of the Bible was among the last to be handwritten. Soon afterwards came the invention of the printing press. Also, there was renewed interest in Greek and Hebrew languages which resulted in their revival insofar as Bible translation was concerned. New copies from old manuscripts of Hebrew and Greek had been made in the 12th century. When these literary advances were coupled with the desire for church reformation, it resulted in the period which brought forth men like Erasmus and William Tyndale.
BIBLES PRINTED BY PRINTING PRESS
Erasmus was a scholar of the Greek language, and his work focused mainly upon the New Testament. His was the first New Testament to be printed on a printing press. It was printed in Greek, copied from the 10th and 12th century Greek manuscripts. Another scholar, XIMENES, also had a Greek New Testament about to be printed. Erasmus apparently came under some pressure from his publisher to have his work printed first. This pressure did not bode well for accuracy. Erasmus succeeded in having his text printed first, but later he admitted that it was at the expense of accuracy in certain instances. Fortunately, however, these inaccuracies are quite obvious and easily identified by the serious Bible student.
One obvious example of an improperly translated piece of the bible is the passage in (1jo 5:6-7) (King James Version). It was taken from the Vulgate (Latin text) and it was forged into one of Erasmus' Greek manuscripts. He discerned the forgery, but in the haste and pressure for printing he decided to overlook it. The passage is not contained in any other manuscript, and the Revised Version correctly leaves it out.
William Tyndale was contemporary with Erasmus. Both lived in the time period around 1500 A.D. Tyndale was a very determined man with a remarkable knowledge of Greek and Hebrew. His version of the Bible was a translation direct from the most original Hebrew and Greek sources available to him, with some influence from the Latin Vulgate and the work of Erasmus. Thousands of copies of the complete Bible in the English language rolled off the press to be distributed to the eager and waiting hands of his fellowman. His life soon came to be in peril in England and he fled to Germany where the printing continued and Bibles were smuggled into England in bales of cloth and sacks of flour. The success was overwhelming, for there were far too many Bibles coming in to be destroyed by burning. But even in Germany, Tyndale was at last betrayed. He was taken to a miserable dungeon near Brussels, where he barely existed for some time at the hands of men devoid of mercy and compassion. Afterwards he was taken to the stake where he was strangled and burnt. His work, however, lived on.
THE KING JAMES VERSION
About the time of Tyndale's death, Henry VIII had a quarrel with the pope, the result of which was the establishment of the Church of England. Henry, and the Church of England, were favorable to the idea of a Bible for the people. The bishops of the English church were still offended by the stigma of Tyndale's name, and therefore his work was not sanctioned by them. The other Bibles which followed, however, were little more than editions of Tyndale's Bible. Then, in 1611, King James I issued the command which resulted in the translation and publishing of The King James Version. It differs little from the Bible of Tyndale, having as its base much the same sources -- the Hebrew and Greek manuscripts of the 12th century A.D., and, to a lesser degree, the Latin Vulgate. Approximately 80% of the Old Testament and 90% of the New Testament appear to be directly transferred from Tyndale's Bible.
The translation known as the King James Version has had a profound effect upon the life and literature particularly of Western civilization. It is now been 4 centuries since it was made. It is still the most commonly accepted; however, due to the changing English language, many words used in it are changed in meaning or have become obsolete entirely.
New discoveries of many old manuscripts since the publishing of the King James Version - such as the Samaritan revision manuscript., the Greek Septuagint, the Syriac version, the Sinaitic manuscript, the Vatican manuscript, the Alexandrian manuscripts, and others - prompted the writing of the Revised Version which was undertaken in 1870 and completed in 1885. A further revision some years later produced the REVISED STANDARD VERSION. We can rest assured that with the combination of the King James Version and the Revised Standard Version we have the original word of God as much as one language can express another. The reasons for the value of the combination of the two versions we will explain later.
In the 1940s two remarkable discoveries occurred. The Egyptian Manuscripts commented upon in Lesson 2 were unearthed in 1941, and have provided an excellent source for checking New Testament accuracy of modern versions. The discovery of the Dead Sea Scrolls in 1947 are equally valuable for the Old Testament. They are in Hebrew and date back in time about 2000 years - to about the time of Christ or just before. They are almost contemporary with the completion of the Greek Septuagint. They were copied by members of the Qumran community, a religious order of that time. Again, like the Egyptian manuscripts they provide an excellent means of cross-checking for accuracy of text. Much work is still going on concerning these finds and as time progresses we may have a full translation of them in English.
One thing is to be noted, the Egyptian Manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls corroborate and support most of the translations currently in existence, particularly the King James Version and the Revised Standard Version. Surely this is a tribute to the hundreds of translators and copiers through the centuries of time; for in the Dead Sea Scrolls we have a treasure of manuscripts at least 1000 years older than any formerly in existence, and yet the variation is negligible. Even more so, however, does this indicate to us a guiding power throughout the translation and copying of scripture that is stronger and more consistent and accurate than merely the hand or will of man. It speaks to us of a power that works by natural means and in natural ways, but ultimately accomplishes that which is exactly as it was designed to be from the beginning.
Have you ever wondered what it is that God really wants from you? And in all this studying, do you wonder - "What's in it for me?". The Bible plainly tells us what God wants from us, and what is in it for us.
His plan is to fill the Earth with His glory. It's to fill it with people who are part of Himself. What is needed from us is to start serving him Now. Now is the time to become a son or a daughter of God. We do this by believing in Him, in the things that he says, and in His Son Jesus. Then we must repent of our sins - admit we sin and then get Baptised believing in the things concerning the Kingdom of God and the name of Jesus Christ. Then we need to live a life that puts God First - that respects His commands - which all told are love. They are ways of love, kindness, happiness and fairness. They involve helping others and helping each other. Think about it. Please keep all this in mind as you do the lessons.
Daily Bible Reading Plan at http://readings.bereans.org
1. What is the primary importance of the Syriac Version?
2. What prompted the writing of the Latin Vulgate?
3. Is the policy of the Roman Church concerning the Latin Vulgate consistent with historical facts?
4. Was the Latin Vulgate readily available to the general public?
5. What made the Wycliffe Bible different from all others before it?
6. What happened to those who possessed the Wycliffe Bible?
7. What was the first Bible to be printed on the printing press?
8. What was the problem with this Bible?
9. What were the sources of the Tyndale Bible?
10. What was the reaction of the authorities to the publication of the Tyndale Bible?
11. What was the reaction of the people to the publication of the Tyndale Bible?
12. What circumstances prompted King James I to issue a command to translate and publish the King James Version?
13. Which were the sources used for the publishing of the King James Version?
14. Was the majority of the King James version translated or transferred?
15. Why might this distinction be important for us to understand?
16. What prompted the writing of the Revised Version?
17. Are the King James Version and the Revised Version considered to be reliable transmissions of the original word of God?
18. Why are the Egyptian manuscripts and the Dead Sea Scrolls important?